12.27.2009

ACORN V indicated, NY Times artile small, hard to find

A newreporton the community group Acorn by the
nonpartisan Congressional Research Service has found no evidence of
fraudulent voting or of violations of federal financing rules by the
group in the past five years.

RepresentativeJohn Conyers Jr., Democrat of Michigan and chairman of
the House Judiciary Committee, requested the report along with
RepresentativeBarney
Frank, Democrat of
Massachusetts. Mr. Conyers released the report on Tuesday.

Acorn, which stands for
theAssociation of
Community Organizations for Reform Now, has drawn fire from conservative activists who have
accused it of conducting fraudulent voter registration drives in poor
neighborhoods, adding imaginary voters like Mickey Mouse to the rolls.
The report by the research service, an arm of theLibrary of
Congress, said,
however, that a search using the Nexis news database "did not
identify any reported instances of such individuals attempting to vote
at the polls."

Hans A. von
Spakovsky, a
formerFederal Election
Commissionmember
under PresidentGeorge
W. Bush, said the new
report could not resolve the voting fraud issue, since "no one is
ever going to know it unless somebody takes the voter registration
list and checks each person who is registered to make sure they are a
real person."

The report also stated that
two conservative activists might have broken privacy laws in
California and Maryland by posing as a prostitute and pimp while
secretly videotaping Acorn staff members who gave them advice on
evading taxes and hiding their activities. The two states "appear to
ban" the recording of face-to-face conversations without the consent
of all participants, the report said.

Another part of the new
report suggested that efforts by Congress to cut Acorn's financing
could be unconstitutional bills of attainder, a term referring to
punishments ordered by Congress against specific individuals or
entities.
On Tuesday,
JudgeNina
Gershonof Federal
District Court in Brooklyn issued a one-page order supporting
Acorn's challenge to the legislation on bill-of-attainder grounds.
This month, Judge Gershon ruled that cutting the group's financing
was an illegal bill of attainder. In Tuesday's order, she denied a
motion by the Justice Department to reconsider her previous
ruling.

Get the Word Out! Intimidation of Foreign Workers Now Directed at Americans

Intimidation of Foreign Workers Now Directed at Americans: Facebook, Yahoo, Comcast Drawn In

All I want for Christmas is a progressive blogger to cover this threat to all American worker web sites.

"Nuisance lawsuits and threats of legal entanglement, long used by Indian H-1b labor contractors to silence Indian tech workers, have now been aimed at an American tech worker website, endh1b.com, for reposting an Indian H-1B worker's testimony of mistreatment by Apex Technology Group.

A New Jersey judge, sided with Apex Tenchnology Group on Wednesday  and ordered Facebook, Yahoo, and Comcast and  to reveal the identities of three John Does named in the injunction.

If successful, this injunction will squelch every American's security to post their workplace complaints anonymously. It will create a credible threat that, at any time, web hosting and web site companies could be forced to reveal identities of anonymous posters."

More here:

http://www.dailykos.com/story/2009/12/25/133335/82?new=true

PS: We'll get coverage of this on Monday in the press, but we need to get the bloggers on board right away!

Donna Conroy, Director
www.brightfuturejobs.com

12.23.2009

Fwd: [MCM] Gun owner nabbed near Obama was Bush WH employee




The man who was arrested with two guns and hundreds of rounds of ammunition near the Capitol
during President Barack Obama's health care speech in September had been an employee of the George
W. Bush White House. The arrest of the man, Joshua Bowman, was widely reported at the time, but the news stories made no mention of his previous employment: For several years he worked in the Executive Office of the President, dealing with tech issues, including White House emails, his lawyer, George Braun, tells Mother Jones.
On the night of September 9, Bowman was on his way to meet Braun, a Bush administration political appointee, at the National Republican Club on First Street, SE when he was stopped by Capitol Police around 7:45 p.m.-minutes before Obama was scheduled to deliver a major address to Congress pushing his health care initiative. Bowman had driven up to a security checkpoint and told officers he wanted to park, but his lack of a permit for the area aroused their suspicions, and they asked to search his car.

Bowman had a bumper sticker like this one on his car, according to court records. (Patriot Depot).

The previous weekend, Bowman and Braun had gone duck-hunting, according to Braun. But Bowman forgot that he still had the guns in his car when he consented to a search of his vehicle, a Honda Civic
with a bumper sticker proclaiming, "I'll keep my guns, freedom, and money.... you keep the change."
The officers found a Beretta 12 gauge semi-automatic* shotgun, a .22 caliber long rifle, and over 400 rounds of ammunition in Bowman's trunk. The guns were unloaded and in their cases, according to court records. Braun says they were disassembled. The Capitol Police took Bowman into custody and charged him with two counts of possession of an unregistered firearm and one count of unlawful possession of ammunition. He faced up to $3,000 in fines and as much as three years in jail. (The case is still pending.)
When Braun-who was at the National Republican Club, hanging out with congressmen including Iowa's Tom Latham and Nebraska's Lee Terry-finally heard from Bowman, it was around 10 p.m. Bowman told Braun he needed Braun to get him out of jail, explaining that he had been stopped with guns in his car. "Don't you know that's illegal?" Braun asked.  Both men were surprised when they heard the story on
the radio as they left jail the next day. Braun thought the coverage was excessive. "They were making
him sound like a terrorist," Braun said. "Does [Bowman] look like a terrorist? He has the élan to walk around with a bowtie."
Braun suggested that Bowman was only caught with the guns because he was used to having a White House security pass and expected to be able to park near the Capitol. He probably wouldn't have been stopped and searched by Capitol Police if he had still had the pass. He had left government employ just
a few weeks earlier, having landed a high-paying job at Northrop Grumman. "He hung out for a long
time. He worked for a Republican administration and he was pretty much the last person in the
Democratic administration. It's not that he thought the new administration was right or wrong-it's
called 'a year and a day,' and Josh was there for six," Braun said, referring to the Washington tradition
of working a government job for long enough to put it on your resume and then leaving for a higher-paid private sector gig.
It seems pretty clear that Bowman wasn't planning anyone any harm when he drove to Capitol Hill in September. Braun claims the Secret Service was unconcerned about the incident (no federal charges
were filed) because they knew Bowman from his years in the White House. But having unregistered
guns in the District of Columbia is illegal (although perhaps not for much longer if gun rights advocates continue to win court challenges), and Bowman certainly made a big mistake. Even his girlfriend thought so. "His girlfriend called me up and asked, 'Is my boyfriend the stupidest guy in the world or what?'"
Braun said. For the moment, it's unclear whether that mistake will land Bowman in jail.
*An earlier version of this article described the shotgun as automatic.

The 2009 P.U.-Litzer Awards

Media Advisory
Support FAIR TodayThe 2009 P.U.-Litzer Awards

12/22/09

For 17 years our colleagues Jeff Cohen and Norman Solomon have worked with FAIR to present the P.U.-Litzers, a year-end review of some of the stinkiest examples of corporate media malfeasance, spin and just plain outrageousness.

Starting this year, FAIR has the somewhat dubious honor of reviewing the nominees and selecting the winners. It's a dirty job, but someone has to do it. So, without further ado, we present the 2009 P.U.-Litzers.


--The Remembering Reagan Award
WINNER: Joe Klein, Time


Time columnist Joe Klein (12/3/09), not altogether impressed by Obama's announcement of a troop escalation in Afghanistan, wrote that a president "must lead the charge--passionately and, yes, with a touch of anger."

He described the better way to do this:

Ronald Reagan would have done it differently. He would have told a story. It might not have been a true story, but it would have had resonance. He might have found, or created, a grieving spouse--a young investment banker whose wife had died in the World Trade Center--who enlisted immediately after the attacks...and then gave his life, heroically, defending a school for girls in Kandahar. Reagan would have inspired tears, outrage, passion, a rush to recruiting centers across the nation.

Ah, Reagan--now there was a president who could inspire people to fight and die based on lies.


--The Cheney 2012 Award
WINNER: Jon Meacham, Newsweek


Newsweek editor Jon Meacham declared (12/7/09) that Dick Cheney running for president in 2012 would be "good for the Republicans and good for the country." He explained that "Cheney is a man of conviction, has a record on which he can be judged, and whatever the result, there could be no ambiguity about the will of the people.... A campaign would also give us an occasion that history denied us in 2008: an opportunity to adjudicate the George W. Bush years in a direct way."

While the 2008 election might have seemed a sufficient judgment of the Bush years, it's worth pointing out that at beginning of the year (1/19/09), Meacham was adamantly opposed to re-hashing Cheney's record, calling it "the rough equivalent of pornography--briefly engaging, perhaps, but utterly predictable and finally repetitive." The difference? That was in response to the idea that Cheney should be held accountable for lawbreaking. Apparently a few months later, the same record is grounds for a White House run.


--The Them Not Us Award
WINNER: Martin Fackler, New York Times


The New York Times (11/21/09) describes the severe problems with Japan's elite media--a horror show where "reporters from major news media outlets are stationed inside government offices and enjoy close, constant access to officials. The system has long been criticized as antidemocratic by both foreign and Japanese analysts, who charge that it has produced a relatively spineless press that feels more accountable to its official sources than to the public. In their apparent reluctance to criticize the government, the critics say, the news media fail to serve as an effective check on authority."

The mind reels.


--The Thin-Skinned Pundits Award
WINNER: Dana Milbank, Washington Post


Washington Post reporters Dana Milbank and Chris Cilizza got into trouble when, in an episode of their "Mouthpiece Theater" web video series, they suggested brands of beer that would be appropriate for various politicians. What would Hillary Clinton drink? Apparently something called "Mad Bitch." The video, unsurprisingly, was roundly criticized, and was pulled from the Post site. So what lesson was learned? Milbank complained (8/6/09) that "it's a brutal world out there in the blogosphere.... I'm often surprised by the ferocity out there, but I probably shouldn't be."

Yes, the problem with calling someone a "bitch" is the "ferocity" of your critics.


--The Sheer O'Reillyness Award
WINNER: Bill O'Reilly, Fox News Channel--TWICE!


1) Asked by a Canadian viewer, "Has anyone noticed that life expectancy in Canada under our health system is higher than the USA?," Fox's O'Reilly (7/27/09) responded: "Well, that's to be expected, Peter, because we have 10 times as many people as you do. That translates to 10 times as many accidents, crimes, down the line."

2) Drumming up fear of Democrats' tax plans: "Nancy Pelosi and her far-left crew want to raise the top federal tax rate to 45 percent. That's not capitalism. That's Fidel Castro stuff, confiscating wages that people honestly earn."

Perhaps Castro was president of the United States in 1982-86, when the top rate was 50 percent. Or maybe all of the 1970s, when it was 70 percent. Or from 1950-63, when it was 91 percent.


--The Less Talk, More Bombs Award
WINNER: David Broder, Washington Post


Post columnist Broder expressed the conventional wisdom on Barack Obama's deliberations on the Afghanistan War, writing under the headline "Enough Afghan Debate" (11/15/09):

It is evident from the length of this deliberative process and from the flood of leaks that have emerged from Kabul and Washington that the perfect course of action does not exist. Given that reality, the urgent necessity is to make a decision--whether or not it is right.


--The Racism Is Dead Award
WINNER: Richard Cohen, Washington Post


Post columnist Richard Cohen wrote (5/5/09): "The justification for affirmative action gets weaker and weaker. Maybe once it was possible to argue that some innocent people had to suffer in the name of progress, but a glance at the White House strongly suggests that things have changed. For most Americans, race has become supremely irrelevant. Everyone knows this. Every poll shows this."

For the record, "every poll" does not actually show this; the vast majority of Americans continues to recognize that racism is still a problem. Cohen went on to write months later--still presumably living in his racism-free world--that he did not believe Iran's claims about its nuclear program, because "these Persians lie like a rug."


--The When in Doubt, Talk to the Boss Award
WINNER: Matt Lauer, NBC News


Today show host Lauer announced a special guest on April 15: "If you really want to know how the economy is affecting the average American, he's the guy to talk to." Who was Lauer talking about? Wal-Mart CEO Mike Duke. The ensuing interview touched on the Employee Free Choice Act, which Lauer noted was supported by many unions but opposed by some large corporations--leading him to ask Duke, "What's the truth?" Yes, look for "the truth" about a proposed pro-labor bill from the new CEO of an adamantly anti-labor corporation.


--The Socialist Menace Award
WINNER: Michael Freedman, Newsweek


Newsweek's "We Are All Socialists Now" cover (2/16/09) certainly turned heads, but one of the stories inside explained in more detail the real threat. As senior editor Michael Freedman asked: "Have you noticed that Barack Obama sounds more like the president of France every day?"

The real problem, though, is what that's going to do to us Americans, says Freedman: "If job numbers continue to look dismal, or get even worse, an ever-greater number of people will start looking to the government for support.... It's very easy to imagine a chorus of former American individualists demanding cushy French-style pensions and free British-style healthcare if their private stock funds fail to recover and unemployment inches upward toward 10 percent and remains there."

Pensions and healthcare for all--this is worse than we thought!


--The Iraq All Over Again Award
WINNER: Too Many to Name


After the invasion of Iraq, countless journalists who had treated allegations about Iraq's weapons of mass destruction as facts were embarrassed when there were no such weapons to be found. So you'd think they'd be more careful about thinly sourced claims that Iran is seeking nuclear weapons. But in 2009, many journalists are still willing to treat such allegations as facts.

-NBC's Chris Matthews (10/4/09): "As if Afghanistan were not enough, now there's Iran's move to get nuclear weapons."

-NBC's David Gregory (10/4/09). "Iran--will talks push that country to give up its nuclear weapons program?"

-Fox News Channel's Bill O'Reilly (9/25/09): "All hell breaking loose as a new nuclear weapons facility is discovered in Iran, proving the mullahs have been lying for years.... Iran's nuclear weapons program has now reached critical mass. And worldwide conflict is very possible. Friday, President Obama, British Prime Minister Brown and French President Sarkozy revealed a secret nuclear weapons facility located inside Iran."

Some even went further, turning allegations of a nuclear weapons program into the discovery of actual nuclear weapons:

-ABC's Good Morning America host Bill Weir (9/26/09): "President Obama and a united front of world leaders charge Iran with secretly building nuclear weapons."


--The Talking Like a Terrorist Award
WINNER: Thomas Friedman, New York Times


In a January 14 column, New York Times superstar pundit Tom Friedman explained Israel's war on Lebanon as an attempt to "educate" the enemy by killing civilians: The Israeli strategy was to "inflict substantial property damage and collateral casualties on Lebanon at large. It was not pretty, but it was logical." Friedman added, "The only long-term source of deterrence was to exact enough pain on the civilians--the families and employers of the militants--to restrain Hezbollah in the future." That strategy of targeting civilians to advance a political agenda is usually known as terrorism; Osama bin Laden couldn't have explained it much better.


--The It Only Bothers Us Now Award
WINNER: Wall Street Journal editorial page


When Barack Obama only called on journalists from a list during a press conference, the Wall Street Journal did not like the new protocol (2/12/09):"We doubt that President Bush, who was notorious for being parsimonious with follow-ups, would have gotten away with prescreening his interlocutors."

Actually, Bush was famous for calling only on reporters on an approved list; as he joked at a press conference on the eve of the Iraq War (3/6/03), "This is scripted."


--The No Comment Award
WINNERS: MSNBC's Mika Brzezinski and Rush Limbaugh


When asked by Politico (10/16/09) to name her favorite guest, MSNBC host Mika Brzezinski named arch-conservative Pat Buchanan "because he says what we are all thinking."

Rush Limbaugh on Obama (Fox News Channel, 1/21/09): "We are being told that we have to hope he succeeds, that we have to bend over, grab the ankles...because his father was black."

To read this advisory online, please visit: http://salsa.democracyinaction.org/dia/track.jsp?v=2&c=fNVySxoRfsWfrItRUTIlbJ%2BewMkBtveX


Unsubscribe from this list

If you were forwarded this message and you want to receive future FAIR alerts delivered directly to you, subscribe by clicking here.

Home | Contact Us | Support Us | RSS | Privacy Policy | Copyright Policy

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

12.01.2009

Fwd: 28th Amendment!




USA patriotic web page divider

animated U.S. flag


Proposed Amendment 28 to the US Constitution!

Congress shall make no law that applies to any citizen of the United States that does not apply equally to all US Senators and Representatives, and Congress shall make no law that applies to any US Senator or Representative that does not apply equally to all citizens of the United States . All existing laws and regulations that do not meet these criteria shall be declared null and void! 

Pass it on!

 


10.22.2009

Quote of the Day

Politics is the art of looking for trouble, finding it everywhere, diagnosing it incorrectly and applying the wrong remedies.

~Groucho Marx

10.11.2009

Elected officials side with corporations over rape victims

These are the Senators who favor corporate protection over rape victims' right to sue:

Alexander (R-TN)
Barrasso (R-WY)
Bond (R-MO)
Brownback (R-KS)
Bunning (R-KY)
Burr (R-NC)
Chambliss (R-GA)
Coburn (R-OK)
Cochran (R-MS)
Corker (R-TN)
Cornyn (R-TX)
Crapo (R-ID)
DeMint (R-SC)
Ensign (R-NV)
Enzi (R-WY)
Graham (R-SC)
Gregg (R-NH)
Inhofe (R-OK)
Isakson (R-GA)
Johanns (R-NE)
Kyl (R-AZ)
McCain (R-AZ)
McConnell (R-KY)
Risch (R-ID)
Roberts (R-KS)
Sessions (R-AL)
Shelby (R-AL)
Thune (R-SD)
Vitter (R-LA)
Wicker (R-MS)


Read more at: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/10/07/meet-the-senators-who-vot_n_312976.html

10.04.2009

Bush Invoked Biblical Prophesy as Reason to Invade Iraq

I could only find this story in a few places--in the Columbia Daily Tribune, I read that it was in GQ magazine but didn't find it upon searching--Jonathon Turley blogged about it, and so did one person in the Daily Kos.

Jonathon Turley's analysis May 25, 2009

Daily Kos fact check. May 27,2009

The story in Columbia Daily Tribune August 2009

Now, this leaves one to wonder why the major media outlets didn't pick up the story. I am not a fundamentalist Christian myself, and I find it dizzying that the leader of our country believed that going to war with Iraq was some kind of Biblical mandate.

I find this deeply disturbing. Why don't the editors of the major newspapers find this worthy of reporting? Is it too hot to touch? Is it being censored? If so, what is the reasoning behind suppressing the story?

9.28.2009

9/11 Families Seek a Fresh Investigation of 9/11 Events

Mark Crispin Miller Reports:

9/11 Families March on City Hall As City Seeks to Stop Fresh Probe of Attacks from Going on November Ballot;

NY Supreme Court Hearing 9:30AM Tuesday Will Determine Fate of Referendum


New York City - Yesterday, The
New York City Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN), a group comprising 9/11 family members, first responders and survivors, led 300 New Yorkers from Battery Park to City Hall in protest of the City's attempt to block the referendum for a fresh probe of the 9/11 attacks from going on the November ballot.

The grassroots organization calling for the investigation,
NYCCAN, has complete coverage of the movement and the march, yesterday.

For more information about and from Mark Crispin Miller, see his excellent coverage at his website, http://markcrispinmiller.com

7.14.2009

Texas' surveillance program out of money, only 11 arrests

From Raw Story:

The state of Texas spent a $2 million federal grant to install 14 Webcams along its border with Mexico. After its first year, the crowd-sourced surveillance program is out of money and has only yielded 11 arrests, according to published reports.

$2,000,000

By my calculation, that works out to $181,818.18 per person.

http://rawstory.com/08/news/2009/07/13/texas-webcam-border-watch-a-failure-after-first-year/

4.20.2009

It's Official: No U.S. Prosecution of Bush Officials

THIS IS A MAJOR DISAPPOINTMENT. I THOUGHT WE ARE A NATION OF LAWS. ??Emanuel said that the president believes Bush officials "should not be prosecuted either and that's not the place that we go." Not that that should surprise anyone: Obama said as much from almost his first day in office, when he told reporters he wasn't interested in a proposed Capitol Hill "truth commission."

read more | digg story

4.07.2009

Susan Wilk sent you an article from startribune.com

Susan Wilk wrote these comments: Al Franken made a net gain today in a count of formerly rejected absentee ballots that pushed his advantage to more than 300 votes in the U.S. Senate race.

This Article from StarTribune.com has been sent to you by SusanWilk.
*Please note, the sender's identity has not been verified.

The full Article, with any associated images and links can be viewed here.
Franken extends lead over Coleman
KEVIN DUCHSCHERE, Star Tribune

Democrat Al Franken today extended his lead over Republican Norm Coleman in Minnesota's U.S. Senate election, after the counting of about 350 formerly rejected absentee ballots this morning.

Franken captured 198 of the ballots, while Coleman took 111. The ballots added 87 votes to Franken’s recount lead, enlarging his margin over Coleman to 312.

The result makes it even more likely that, barring an unforeseen circumstance, Franken will prevail in the election lawsuit that Coleman filed in January to contest the Democrat's 225-vote recount lead. The three-judge panel presiding over the case has not said when it will issue a final decision.

Coleman will appeal the case to the Minnesota Supreme Court, his lawyer Ben Ginsberg said after today's proceedings. One of the grounds for the appeal will be unequal treatment of the ballots, Ginsberg said.

This morning, officials sat down at four tables in the St. Paul courtroom with staffers and campaign officials, separating the ballots from their envelopes so that they can be counted without identifying the voter.

Then, one by one, state elections director Gary Poser counted ballots that were accepted by the judges as having been legally cast. The process was much like that with 933 other formerly rejected ballots that were counted before final recount numbers were certified in early January.

On Monday, the three-judge panel had reviewed nearly 400 to determine which ones would be opened and counted today.

Before the start of today’s action, Coleman lawyer Tony Trimble asked for a 15-minute recess to examine the judges’ list of ballots to be counted. Judge Elizabeth Hayden turned him down, saying that they were ready to proceed.

Security was unusually tight for the court session. State troopers and security guards watched the entrance to the courtroom at the Minnesota Judicial Center, and people wishing to enter the courtroom were asked to empty their pockets and walk through a magnetometer.

4.05.2009

Ice Bridge Is Gone. Overnight

The ice bridge is a stable structure, one that takes centuries to form.

3.20.2009

3.11.2009

Quote of the day

"Remember, the Republican Party right now is in the shadow of the Bush administration. We're in the last stage of digesting the tummy ache of having bad Congressional leadership; the worst Treasury Secretary in history; a bad economy. The Republican Party got fired for good reason; it deserved it."

-- Newt Gingrich, in an interview with Essence magazine.

3.06.2009

Correcting the Bush Years Series: Breaking News!

Sources tell the Associated Press President Obama will reverse
restrictions on federal funding of stem cell research Monday.

Isn't it nice to have a President who believes in science?

2.09.2009

Fwd: [MCM] Leahy proposes "Truth Commission"


Leahy Proposes 'Truth Commission' to Probe Bush Abuses

By Jason Leopold   
The Public Record

Monday, 09 February 2009 12:07

http://www.pubrecord.org/torture/673-leahy-proposes-truth-commission-to-probe-bush-era-abuses.html

Senator Patrick Leahy Monday proposed the creation of a "truth and reconciliation commission" to investigate Bush administration abuses such as its use of torture and domestic surveillance.

Leahy, the chairman of the powerful Senate Judiciary Committee, made the announcement during a speech at Georgetown University's Law Center.

His announcement will likely be followed in the days ahead with a proposed bill to create an investigative panel "to get to the bottom of what happened, and why, so we make sure it never happens again."

"One path to that goal would be a reconciliation process and truth commission," Leahy said. "We could develop and authorize a person or group of people universally recognized as fair minded, and without axes to grind. Their straightforward mission would be to find the truth. People would be invited to come forward and share their knowledge and experiences, not for purposes of constructing criminal indictments, but to assemble the facts. If needed, such a process could involve subpoena powers, and even the authority to obtain immunity from prosecutions in order to get to the whole truth."

President George W. Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney both admitted publicly last year they had personally authorized the waterboarding of at least three suspected terrorists and allowed interrogators to use harsh methods against 33 other suspects. However, Bush and Cheney denied that these actions violated anti-torture laws.

Waterboarding is a technique that makes the victim believe he is drowning and has been regarded as torture at least since the Spanish Inquisition. The U.S. government has treated its use in battlefield interrogations as a war crime, and the Justice Department prosecuted a Texas sheriff in the 1980s for using waterboarding to extract confessions from suspects.

Last month, Leahy's counterpart in the House, Rep. John Conyers, introduced legislation to create a blue-ribbon panel of outside experts to probe the "broad range" of policies pursued by the Bush administration "under claims of unreviewable war powers," including torture of detainees and warrantless wiretaps.

In a column published Jan. 31 on the Huffington Post, Conyers said an examination of what the Bush administration has done requires a comprehensive overview of how these abusive policies evolved.

"While disparate investigations by committees of Congress, private organizations and the press have uncovered many important facts, no single investigation has had access to the full range of information regarding the Bush administration's interrelated programs on surveillance, detention, interrogation and rendition," Conyers wrote.

"The existence of a substantially developed factual record will simplify the work to come, but cannot replace it. Furthermore, much of this information, such as the Central Intelligence Agency's 2004 Inspector General report on interrogation, remains highly classified and hidden from the American people. An independent review is needed to determine the maximum information that can be publicly released."

While Conyers has also called for the appointment of an independent counsel to launch a criminal probe into the Bush administration's policies, Leahy said his proposal would be designed to appease public demands for accountability and not recommend prosecutions of any sort.

"We need to come to a shared understanding of the mistakes of the past," said Leahy, a Vermont Democrat. "Rather than vengeance, we need a fair-minded pursuing of what happened....I don't want to embarrass anybody. I don't want to punish anybody. I just want the truth to come out so this never happens again."

Leahy said the commission, whose membership could either be congressional or presidential appointees, would have subpoena power and could grant witnesses immunity from prosecution in exchange for their testimony--except in cases of perjury--about how some of the Bush administration's most controversial policies were formed.

Leahy is one of a handful of Democratic leaders who has come out in support of investigating the Bush administration's policies since Barack Obama's inauguration last month.

Last month, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said he would support funding and staff for additional fact-finding by the Senate Armed Services Committee, which last month released a report tracing abuse of detainees at Guantanamo Bay and Abu Ghraib to Bush's Feb. 7, 2002, decision to exclude terror suspects from Geneva Convention protections.

Additionally, Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse, D-Rhode Island, a former federal prosecutor and a member of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said during a conference two weeks ago that, "we need to follow this thing into those dense weeds and shine a bright light into what was done."

Whitehouse's made those comments at a two-day medical conference sponsored by Physicians for Human Rights (PHR), which has called for an investigation into the Bush administration's use of interrogation techniques that have been widely regarded as torture.

"We can paper it over if we choose, but the blueprint is still lying there for others to do it all over again. It's important that we not let this moment pass," he told the 400 or so attendees.

Democratic Majority Leader Steny Hoyer of Maryland told reporters: "Looking at what has been done is necessary."  And House Speaker Nancy Pelosi expressed support for House Judiciary Committee Chairman John Conyers's plan to create a blue-ribbon panel of outside experts to probe the "broad range" of policies pursued by the Bush administration "under claims of unreviewable war powers."

Attorney General Eric Holder said during his confirmation hearing earlier this month that "waterboarding is torture," but the Obama administration has hesitated to launch new investigations of the Bush administration's crimes partly out of fear that would infuriate Republicans who might retaliate by obstructing Democratic economic plans during a deepening recession.

On Monday, some Republicans dismissed Leahy's remarks as "politics as usual."

"No good purpose is served by continuing to persecute those who served in the previous administration," said Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas. "President Obama promised to usher in an era of "change" and bipartisan harmony. Unfortunately, the continued effort by some Democrats to unjustly malign former Bush Administration officials is politics as usual."

Incoming CIA Director Leon Panetta said during his confirmation hearing last week that the Obama administration would not seek to prosecute CIA interrogators who performed brutal techniques, such as waterboarding, against suspected terrorist detainees.

Panetta told The Associated Press in an interview after his confirmation hearing that "we just can't operate if people feel even if they are following the legal opinions of the Justice Department they could be in danger of prosecution."

The authors of those legal memos, however, are under scrutiny by a Justice Department watchdog.

Sen. Whitehouse and Sen. Dick Durbin, D-Illinois, wrote a letter to the agency last year requesting an investigation into the role "Justice Department officials [played] in authorizing and/or overseeing the use of waterboarding by the Central Intelligence Agency... and whether those who authorized it violated the law."

The senators' Feb. 12, 2008, letter to Inspector General Glenn Fine and H. Marshall Jarrett, head of the Office of Professional Responsibility (OPR), asked them to examine whether the legal advice met professional standards and whether the lawyers were "insulated from outside pressure to reach a particular conclusion?"

Whitehouse and Durbin also asked what role was played by Bush's White House and the CIA in possibly influencing "deliberations about the lawfulness of waterboarding?"

Less than a week later, Jarrett responded by saying the senators' concerns were already part of a pending investigation that OPR was conducting into the genesis of the Aug. 1, 2002, legal opinion widely known as the "torture memo."

The memo, which gave a legal stamp of approval for the Bush administration's torture policies, was written by Deputy Attorney General John Yoo, who worked in the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel (OLC), and was signed by his boss, Jay Bybee, who is now a federal appeals court judge. Yoo is a law professor at the University of California at Berkeley.
The OPR inquiry is expected to be completed by early March.

1.24.2009

Franken-Coleman Update, 01/20/09: He Wants Us To Do WHAT?!

Okay, at this point I think Norm and his Hundred-Lawyer Horde must be doing this just to see how far we can spit our beverages across the room. His people now say that they want the three-judge panel to review all 12,000 rejected absentee ballots -- ballots that have already been reviewed and rejected not once but twice: "Norm Coleman’s

read more | digg story

1.23.2009

Quote

"We are all capable of believing things which we know to be untrue, and then, when we are finally proved wrong, impudently twisting the facts so as to show we were right. Intellectually, it is possible to carry on this process for an indefinite time: the only check on it is that sooner or later a false belief bumps up against solid reality, usually on a battlefield. " -George Orwell In front of your nose 3/22/1946

1.22.2009

Healthcare, Guaranteed: A Simple Secure Solution for America

Healthcare, Guaranteed: A Simple Secure Solution for America
Author: Ezekiel Emanuel
http://www.booktv.org/program.aspx?ProgramId=10145&SectionName=Politics

About the Program

Ezekiel Emanuel, Chair of the Department of Bioethics at the Clinical
Center of the National Institutes of Health presents his plan to
re-imagine the nation's healthcare system. According to Dr. Ezekiel,
the United States spent 2.1 trillion dollars on healthcare in 2007 yet
47 million Americans were uninsured. His proposal includes eliminating
employer-healthcare and creating a independent program that grades
insurance companies and healthcare plans. This event was hosted by the
Commonwealth Club of California in San Francisco.

Upcoming Schedule
Saturday, January 24, at 8:15 PM
Sunday, January 25, at 3:00 PM

1.12.2009

Bush says waterboarding still necessary

digg user susanswilk would like to share this story with you:
http://digg.com/politics/Bush_says_waterboarding_still_necessary?OTC-em-st1
---
"Bush says waterboarding still necessary"
With days left in office and an abysmal approval rating, President Bush is still defending the use of torture.
+27 people dugg this story


To verify that this email was sent by Digg user susanswilk, visit:
http://digg.com/verifymail?key=15c5734daaf785630ab26f91a0e44f61&OTC-em-st2

To opt out of ALL future emails from Digg, visit:
http://digg.com/optout?key=c8f750db92997d283465cbd7c5daf4bd&OTC-em-st3

Digg will NOT store your email address, even if you opt out!
Digg will store only an encrypted key, which even Digg can't decipher.

twitstamp.com