Showing posts with label Al Franken. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Al Franken. Show all posts
12.07.2008
11.27.2008
Minnesota Recount Likely to End Up in Court, Regardless of Winner
This analysis comes from a post on Digg by ThoughtLover (love the name):
Read the WSJ article here
After browsing around trying to figure this out, it appears that Minnesota state law does not allow rejected absentee ballots to be included in a recount, of which there are estimated to be about 6-12k. Many estimations expect Franken to gain votes in the 3000+ contested ballots (currently Coleman has ~100 more contentions). Even with Franken's expected gains, generally people seem to think Franken will lose the recount by about 50 votes. At this point, everything is within the margin of error.
As Minnesota's Canvassing Board doesn't feel they have the authority to make a ruling, this will go to the courts, no matter who wins the recount, to see if the rejected absentee votes can be counted. According to arguments made before Minnesota's Canvassing Board, according to an article in the Wall Stree Journal by John Fund...
Read the WSJ article here
... the court case will likely revolve around:
1) A Minnesota law requiring "complete voting activity be reported."
- Sounds weak to me. Ballots that are legally disqualified and legally denied recount could be reported as "discarded".
2) Equal Protection argument from Bush v Gore (I'm no expert on this ruling)
- This infamous Supreme Court ruling that decided that the different standards of counting ballots across Florida violated the equal protection clause. Similarly, Minnesota's rejected absentee ballots (vs other rejected ballots) are being treated differently. However, similar cases since Bush v Gore have failed because of Bush v Gore's controversial “limited to the present circumstances” ruling that has limited it as being a precedent.
3) Washington State's disputed 2004 governor's race
- A controversial ruling which released names and led to a scramble to obtain written oaths from people declaring how they had intended to vote. The Democrats won because they started their efforts sooner.
All very confusing... my brain hurts.
11.08.2008
Coleman Fails in Attempt to Block Counting of Absentee Votes
Coleman Tried to Block Some Votes from Senate Race Recount
Sen. Norm Coleman has failed in an attempt to block some absentee ballots from being counted in his close race with Democrat Al Franken. Franken was at last count trailing by about 220 votes.
An Associated Press analysis of votes in the tight, still-to-be decided race for a U.S. Senate seat in Minnesota shows that most ballots lacking a recorded choice in the election were cast in counties won by Democrat Barack Obama.
The recount is scheduled to begin on Nov 19.
Sen. Norm Coleman has failed in an attempt to block some absentee ballots from being counted in his close race with Democrat Al Franken. Franken was at last count trailing by about 220 votes.
An Associated Press analysis of votes in the tight, still-to-be decided race for a U.S. Senate seat in Minnesota shows that most ballots lacking a recorded choice in the election were cast in counties won by Democrat Barack Obama.
The recount is scheduled to begin on Nov 19.
11.06.2008
Al Franken's Razor-Thin MN Senate Race Counted on Flawed Opt
UPDATE: A typo brings the race closer. The race is only 221 votes apart, triggering an automatic recount.
PLUS: Details on 'What in the Hell Happened in Alaska' and Georgia and Oregon...
read more digg story
PLUS: Details on 'What in the Hell Happened in Alaska' and Georgia and Oregon...
read more digg story
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)